Indian Council For Re–Writing Secular, Rational, Scientific–Tempered History (ICSRSTH)!
Those readers who have been following the trail of this blog would remember that it all began with the post “Should We Re–Write Indian History?” The secular, rational, scientific–tempered historians who have been re–writing history would have us believe that the objective for ‘re–writing’ is to present a secular, rational, scientific–tempered (SRST) version of India’s history and not to ‘Twist Facts To Suit Theories’ as alleged by the ever–whining Sanghi Bhaktas.
In keeping with its avowed principles of SRST, the newly elected government (in 2004) reconstituted the Indian Council of Historical for Research (ICHR) as the ‘Indian Council For Re–Writing Secular, Rational, Scientific–Tempered History’ (ICSRSTH). The ICSRSH has been tasked to re–write India’s history as ‘secular, rational, scientific–tempered history’ (SRSTH). The doyenne of SRST historians, Ruma Li was appointed its chairperson with similarly qualified and distinguished SRSTHs Irf Ha, Aud Tsk and Ran Gu as its members. The chairperson and members will have no fixed tenure but will be in office till the ICSRSTH completes its job of re–writing India’s history and bringing it up to date. Other SRSTHs will be co–opted to write chapters related to specific periods.
It is not that there was no unofficially–officially curated history before, or that these eminences were not associated with history–writing earlier. There was and they were. Like all quasi–government bodies, the ICHR too was autonomous on paper but in actual practice it was the government that called the shots. It appointed its members and controlled its purse strings.
In the short interregnum of six years between 1998 and 2004 a ‘reactionary’ non–left government was in power and it attempted to make some changes in history–writing. The attempts were unsuccessful of course. The ecosystem—fueled by power and pelf—the previous governments planted took deep ideological roots and it would need determined efforts of a massed army to undo their handiwork. All that the short–lived government achieved was a few screaming headlines denouncing its ‘toxic’ efforts to saffronize history–writing and Op–Eds predicting doomsday if the trend was not reversed. A few years after the ‘reactionary’ government returned to power in 2014, its new HRD minister, more secular, rational and scientific-tempered than true-blue secular, rational and scientific-tempered left-illiberal historians, declared that his government did not change so much as a comma in the secular, rational, scientific-tempered history produced and propagated by the ICSRSTH.
As everyone knows, just as the history of the USA began in the eighteenth century, so did India’s history begin in the tenth century. India had no history before then. The Council decided that Ruma Li and Irf Ha would write the history from the beginning till the reign of Shah Jahan. Aud Tsk would write from the reign of Aurangzeb onwards. The historians have the necessary research experience into the history of the periods. Besides they have knowledge of languages like Sanskrit and its allied languages like Prakrit; Avestan and its allied languages like Old and New Persian; Turkish and its dialects like Chagatai. They have acquired intimate knowledge of epigraphy in various languages and dialects; archaeology and architecture to be able to accurately decipher and interpret stone edicts and archaeological relics.
The Council also decided that Ran Gu would write the modern parts of India’s history beginning with Gandhi and Nehru. As Nehru was a talented cricket player—which he played with his English cohorts while studying in Cambridge (which, he lamented was too crowded with plebian Indians)—it was felt Ran Gu’s intimate knowledge of the game would stand him in good stead in interpreting the sporting streak in Nehru’s psyche. Nehru’s classmates in Cambridge recall that he was a sportive player who played the game not for winning but for the game’s sake. When he bowled, he pitched the balls not to hit the stumps but to fall at the feet of the opposing batsmen to enable them to strike them off the field. When he batted, he left the balls that were pitched at his feet alone to enable opposing bowlers to score maidens. By the by, not many know but in the field of horse racing, the word maiden is used to denote a horse that never won a race!
Ruma Li began at the beginning, when Mohamed Ghazni began distributing hoarded temple wealth to the masses. How did Ghazni distribute hoarded temple wealth if India had no history before the tenth century? Only bigoted Sanghi Bhaktas who lack rationality and scientific–temper (BSBWLRAST) ask such impudent questions. Ghazni found the wealth in the form of forbidden infidel idols made of gold, studded with priceless stones. Each idol was estimated to cost several hundred thousand dinars. He also found wealth estimated at millions of dinars, hidden in temple vaults groaning and begging to be liberated.
Ghazni was a socialist, whose heart bled and bled for the weak and downtrodden. What? The concept of ‘socialism’ did not exist in in the tenth century the way it was since the nineteenth century? You BSBWLRAST! The word might not have been used then but it is the spirit of the noble thought that is to be understood and interpreted by true SRSTHs. As a true patriot, Ghazni took away the wealth to be distributed to the people of his country. He gifted a part of it along with male and female slaves to the Caliphate but it was not because he was a bigot but because of his true allegiance to his religion. The bigoted Sanghi Bhaktas called the male and female laborers conscripted and transported to the Caliphate ‘slaves’ without understanding Ghazni’s noble intention of providing employment to poor unemployed labor.
The noble, scientific–tempered visionary Ghazni reasoned, quite appropriately, that if the wealth was distributed locally in Hindustan, it would make people lazy and, stunt the progress of the society. With the noble intention of providing employment to masons, sculptors and other artisans Ghazni ordered the Sri Krishna temple in Mathura be doused in naphtha, burnt and razed to the ground. It was estimated that it would take two hundred years to recreate the architectural splendor and sculptural grandeur of the temple. The altruist Ghazni wanted thousands of masons, sculptors and other artisans to be gainfully employed for the next two hundred years! He also understood that any new construction on such scale would uplift the economic mood of the society. Earlier historians missed this noble streak in the character of Ghazni. In order to set right the imbalance Ruma Li devoted a chapter to nuance his character.
Ruma Li meticulously chronicled the good deeds of the subsequent conquerors. There was neither Ganga nor Yamuna before Babur arrived in north India and ipso facto there was of course no Ganga–Yamuna Tehzeeb. First, Babur dug the Ganga and two harems later, his grandson Akbar dug the Yamuna. In between them, they planted the Tehzeeb comprising nazrana, jabrana, shukrana and ‘drink, dance and make merry’.
Labels: Akbar, archaeology, Aurangzeb, Avestan, Babur, Chagatai, epigraphy, Gandhi, Ganga-Yamuna Tehzeeb, Indian Council of Secular, Rational Scientific-Tempered Historical Research, Mathura, Mohamed Ghazni, Nehru, Persian, Sanskrit, Turkish
N. B.: Talvin Baffler, founder of the secular, rational, scientific-tempered futurology, who saw this article when it was first published on VOXINDICA on April 13, 2020, said he was struck by the amazing accuracy of its predictions. He predicted that this would exactly be how Indian history would be taught in the 2030s, the world over.